Re: The crash of NASA's culture


From Damian Georgeff <damian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:46:36 +0930
References <00c901c5497a$e857c0b0$cc8b7b3e@porta04> <426CF84F.9FDFA94F@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <028201c54a64$14016d30$0c00a8c0@porta04> <426FA498.5BBDE745@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050427162502.GA21129@xxxxxxx>

Greetings Matt

Thank you for enlightening me on the X-33.

Does NASA use Burt Rutan as a consultant, perhaps he would have more success
designing a replacement for the Shuttler for them?

Be Well
Damian

Matt Wronkiewicz wrote:

> > NASA should look at re-instating the X-33 program, as most of the
> > major development work is done.  For the sections that aren't done,
> > NASA should throw the section(s) open for public submissions.  I have
> > no doubt that there is someone in the world who has an answer(s) for
> > NASA, or can point them in the right direction.
>
> What do you hope to get out of reinstating the X-33 program? Regardless
> of how much work remains to be done, the X-33 craft as designed was a
> suborbital demonstrator, not a Shuttle replacement. Burt Rutan beat the
> X-33 altitude and payload goals last year.
>
> --
> Space Future        | To unsubscribe send email with the subject "unsubscribe"
> www.spacefuture.com | to "sf-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx".
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.4 - Release Date: 27/04/2005



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.4 - Release Date: 27/04/2005

-- 
Space Future        | To unsubscribe send email with the subject "unsubscribe"
www.spacefuture.com | to "sf-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx".